From Space Saver to Building Information Cornerstone

Gord Echlin

The Evolution of the Multi-Point Electrical Meter

Electrical metering in multi-tenant residential and commercial buildings has evolved significantly over the past three decades. Initially the purview of single-point analog meters, high density buildings typically saw multiple single point meters grouped together in significantly sized cabinets — where they were manually read by utility personnel.

First Generation Multi-point Meters — Local, Proprietary

Picture of Quallogi's MiniCloset Multi-point Meter
Quadlogic MiniCloset

Approximately 30 years ago systems that grouped multiple meter-points into a single unit began to emerged. One of the early pioneers of this approach was QuadLogic with its MiniCloset technology. The goal was a smaller footprint in the building, but a secondary outcome was that digital interfaces became a necessity — thereby enabling collection of data from all meters in a building via one central collector local to the building. These were designed to be stand-alone systems, so proprietary protocols were acceptable. 

From these humble “space saving” beginnings, new generations of multi-point electrical meters have risen in profile and are now accepted as cornerstone devices for modern building information management and cost reduction programs.

Second Generation Multi-point Meters — Web centric, Open Systems

Triacta PowerHawk 6312

Generation 1 multi-point meters were the norm for more than a decade until Triacta Power Solutions introduced its PowerHawk 6320 meter in 2005. The PowerHawk was a high density electrical meter sporting a new type of interface — Ethernet. Using open IP protocols, the PowerHawk pushed its information to a centralized collector, which could be on premise, but more likely would be off-premise in the cloud. This new generation of multi-point meter was suitable for integration with both building automation systems (through MODBUS TCP/IP) and energy management systems through IP. 

In addition to measuring electrical current, some second generation multi-point meters added pulse inputs that could collect information from external meters — such as water or gas meters. This addition lay the groundwork for expanding the role of the electrical multi-point meter from simple electrical measurement to building systems information management.

Third Generation Multi-point Meters — More Inputs, More Regulation

Eaton Power Xpert

The emergence of Generation 3 multi-point meters around 2014 is coincident with the rise of more billing regulations, and a growing desire to use multi-point metering as an energy management tool. Entries from companies such as Dent, Siemens, Eaton, Veris, Triacta, and Satec are characterized by a higher number of CT inputs, increased pulse input capacity, and more claims of billing grade accuracy. Generation 3 meters have not evolved greatly, however, in terms of communications capabilities and increased functionality. The prevailing paradigm is still a meter that is a slave to a building automation style collector (connected via MODBUS TCPIP or BACnet IP, or serial busses).

Fourth Generation Multi-point Meters — Advanced Networking, Built-in Logic, Web-centric Services

Where’s it all going? The evolution from Generation 3 to Generation 4 multi-point meters will primarily be in the information networking nature of the device — evolving with the move to a more cloud-based emphasis for building service management. Improvements in network interface capabilities with a cloud-based application focus (such as application programming interfaces (API) and interaction and tagging or object modelling for big data), will favor a flattening of the traditional building IT architecture.

Triacta GATEWAY

Make no mistake, the future of building information management is about web-centric services — and a building’s metering infrastructure designed around open protocols and IP networking is perfectly set up to be a cost-effective cornerstone of that infrastructure. In order to accomplish this, today’s and tomorrow’s multi-point meters have to address security issues, have multi-homing capabilities, use tagging and semantic data models, be fluent in internet protocols and open communication models, and have built-in logic and expansion capabilities for future-proof deployment — all in addition to maintaining accurate, flexible electrical measurement and building services monitoring.

Cloud-centric management is the future of building information. The future of multi-point metering is moving beyond being simply a metering platform to becoming a generic building information intelligence platform — cost justified by its built-in, valuable metering applications, while enabling proactive data-acquisition and control measures directly from the meter.

About the Author

Gordon Echlin is Vice President Marketing and Business Development for Triacta Power Solutions LP, where he has been a management team member since 2009. Prior to Triacta, Gordon was a partner for a boutique venture capital firm, Venture Coaches from 2006 to 2009, and started a telematics company, Netistix Technologies, in 2002. Gordon is a Computer Scientist and technologist by education, and prior to Netistix worked in technical, management and sales roles in Mitel Corporation, Newbridge Corporation and several small startups, since graduating in 1982.

Recent Posts